Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- ug-senate:v [2013/11/21 23:52]
assu-editor
+++ ug-senate:v [2013/11/21 23:53] (current)
assu-editor
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ===== Section 2: Consideration of Draft and Proposed Judicial Changes =====
+==== A. ====
+The US shall consider the JRC’s recommendations, in the form of a bill that lists each judicial change as a separate item. This bill must be previous-noticed and contain the complete text of the JRC’s recommendations.
+==== B. ====
+Failure to consider a given judicial change bill shall not be equivalent to approval of that bill, or of any of the judicial changes in it.
+==== C. ====
+Each proposed judicial change must be approved by a 2/3 vote, or else it shall be considered vetoed.
+==== D. ====
+Draft judicial changes may be provisionally approved or vetoed. Such action shall serve only to indicate to the relevant judicial body the US’s position on the current language of the judicial change.
+==== E. ====
+A provisional approval/veto of a draft judicial change binds the US as to eventual approval or rejection of the corresponding proposed judicial change only if the language of the proposed judicial change is identical to the corresponding draft judicial change.

ASSU Documentation